A similar operational flow process for level 2 assessment is given below. The faculty members of the department/program should be the body who define/refine the student outcomes that gauge the movement of graduates towards the PEOs. With student outcomes defined, the faculty again is the main body who defines performance criteria and implements the educational practices to collect relevant objective evidence on student learning. Depending on the assessment strategies, committee(s) shall analyze the evidence and generate action items accordingly for closure. If there were action items from the last review cycle, decisions have to be made to improve curriculum or to refine the existing student outcomes. The toolsets relevant for Level 2 are the
senior-exit survey, the curriculum outcomes matrix, the student outcomes assessment matrix, and the student outcomes action items matrix.